TWITTER FEED
  • @pointerb was it any good? or just another slum dog millionaire? 2009-11-23
  • written in bone at natural history is highly disturbing, often gross and kind of a must-see. 2009-11-23
  • william eggleston at the corcoran = very highly recommended. closes on sept. 20. 2009-09-13
  • More updates...

Posting tweet...

August 5, 2009

Smart Babble

Filed under: Art, Museums — admin @ 9:18 am

I wrote this for the Smithsonian Affiliations Blog.

The Indianapolis Museum of Art recently launched a well-designed, user-friendly web site well worth exploring. Art Babble displays high-quality videos created by art museums and institutions from across the country.

Art Babble

This is not just a YouTube for art museums. Each entry is supplemented with easily accessible notes that give you more information about the content in the video and links to other videos, relevant web sites, wikipedia entries and related books on Amazon. The videos are also divided into clearly marked chapters for quick access to content and they are all completely transcribed in order to make them widely accessible and searchable in Google and other search engines.

This is an excellent resource for curators, educators and administrators, both as end-users and as potential contributors. Regardless of your area of focus, be it robots or Cuba, Asian art or Ancient art, you will find something here that interests you.

Recently posted videos include an interview with Jean Shin by curator, Joanna Marsh, in which she discusses her fascinating exhibition, Common Threads, recently on view at the Smithsonian American Art Museum.

Museum administrators of all stripes would benefit from watching Max Anderson’s (CEO of the Indianapolis Museum of Art) thoughtful presentation on internet-based technology and museum transparency, which he delivered at the Smithsonian’s Hirshhorn Museum on March 11th of this year.

One of the Smithsonian’s New York City Affiliates, The Rubin Museum of Art, has also partnered with Art Babble and currently has 5 videos on view there, including several artist interviews and one piece documenting the painstaking creation and destruction of an intricate sand mandala.

If you are interested in including your museum’s videos on this site, please send an email to contact@artbabble.org.

July 30, 2009

Smithsonian Launches New Science Website

Filed under: Museums — admin @ 9:23 am

I wrote this for the Smithsonian Affiliations Blog:

The Smithsonian is pleased to announce its newest Web site – Science at the Smithsonian. The site features stories, photographs and videos that spotlight the groundbreaking work of the Smithsonian’s many distinguished scientists and fellows.

Newborn Clouded Leopard at the National Zoo's Conservation and Research Center

Newborn Clouded Leopard at the National Zoo's Conservation and Research Center

Whether assessing the impacts of climate change, ushering in the birth of endangered species or unraveling the mysteries of time and space, Smithsonian Scientists are continually examining some of the world’s most critical and time-sensitive problems.

Now we can offer you a glimpse at some of the most vital research being conducted by our cutting-edge scientific team.

Here is just a peek:

Anthropology: Dog Bones Reveal Ecological History of California’s Channel Islands

Biodiversity: Appalachian Trail Survey Aims Hidden Cameras at Large Predators

Conservation: Baby Boom of Endangered Species at Smithsonian’s National Zoo’s Conservation and Research Center

Ecology: Research collection of pollen grains given to Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

Geology: Andes Mountains are Older than Previously Believed

Astrophysics: Astrophysical Observatory Scientists are Monitoring the Mysterious Movement of Glaciers

Paleobiology: Fossils Show Prehistoric Global Warming

Visit Science at the Smithsonian today.

June 26, 2009

Better Know the District

Filed under: Travel — admin @ 4:27 pm

This article was published in the August 2008 Issue of travelgirl Magazine. The title, “Better Know the District” was rejected despite its clever allusion to The Colbert Report’s 434 part series “Better Know a District.” They opted for the more innocuous title, “The Green Life in D.C.”


In the middle of a vegetable garden outside Restaurant Eve in Alexandria, Virginia, I’m listening to Chef Cathal Armstrong’s musical Irish accent. He is describing how his family went from riches to rags in a matter of months and was forced to use what was once a hobby garden as a grocery store. “As a child, everything I ate came out of our garden. We were very poor, but we ate like royalty,” he said.

Thanks to his spellbinding culinary gifts, he’s left poverty behind, but he hasn’t forgotten his roots. Now he uses another garden to fuel his world-renowned restaurant, which recently received four stars fromThe Washington Post Magazine

I’ve just eaten so much gorgeous food from his kitchen that I’m beginning to feel like I sprained my stomach and that’s when it occurs to me that Chef Armstrong might be the perfect man. He’s handsome, hard working, he cooks (very well), gardens, and he is environmentally responsible. 

Realizing I needed to snap out of my reveries, I start questioning Chef Armstrong about his arugula. After all, I am working. My job is to find out whether the district offers any opportunities for the eco-conscious traveler. As Restaurant Eve’s menu is focused on organic, seasonal and local (like out of the garden in the back), I’d say it qualifies. But D.C.’s green scene doesn’t stop in Eve’s organic garden. In order to get a more in depth look, I head back across the Potomac to my suite at the Fairmont.

The Fairmont Washington, D.C. has recently added an environmentally friendly suite to its hotel. When I first arrived at the “eco-suite,” I was skeptical. What is it about staying in a luxury resort with its individually wrapped, plastic shampoo bottles, massive water consumption and prodigious energy-use that could possibly be considered “green”? In all honesty, not much, but at least when it comes to this particular suite, the Fairmont has done an impressive job. They have managed to marry high-concept design and environmental sustainability remarkably well. 

The suite is designed to look like a black and white photograph. Everything in the room, from the steel-brushed bamboo floors to the eco-friendly paint, materializes itself in various shades of grey. All of the furnishings are either recycled (refinished) or made with environmentally sustainable materials, such as organic cotton or sustainable wool. The only hints of color appear in the bright paintings, created by local D.C. artist, Jon Wassom. 

There is nothing illegitimate, from an environmental point of view, about the design of this suite. Every detail has been thought of down to the contents of the mini-bar, which include biodynamic wines and local, artisan cheeses. The bathrooms, while they do offer individually wrapped shampoos, at least feature Origins Organics line. If you are truly committed, you can take your used packages to an Origins retail store and they will recycle them for you.

The designer responsible for the room, Los Angeles-based, Kelly LaPlante, might be the most fashion-forward environmentalist I’ve ever encountered. When I met her, she was clad in a 1920’s flapper-inspired dress and cloche hat. She beamed as she told me how pleased she was that the industry has advanced to a point where she can work with materials that are both high-end and carbon neutral. She means that, for the first time in a long time, we are beginning to see paints, fabrics and carpeting that are manufactured with the environment in mind. We have, however, seen examples of carbon neutrality and haute design in history. Versailles comes to mind. 

Despite its scratchy, tree-hugging reputation, designing in an environmentally conscious way actually has deeper, more extravagant roots that stretch back to old world nobility. True elegance has always been about authenticity and natural fibers. You cannot synthesize luxury. The issue that major hotels have is less a matter of furnishings (although that exists) than it is energy consumption, but the Fairmont has made company wide efforts to stem the over-consumption of fossil fuels as well. The company has begun to introduce local foods in its menus, purchase carbon offsets and, in some cases, recycle kitchens’ waste oil into bio-diesel fuel stock.

Other hotels in D.C. have taken even more drastic measures. The Willard InterContinental uses 100% wind energy to power their property. It has also implemented water conservation systems that are projected to save more than one million gallons of water by 2009. It is worth contacting this hotel if you are planning on scheduling a meeting in the area. The Willard’s “green meeting” package includes such team-building exercises as a Cherry Tree Planting Ceremony in the National Tidal Basin in order to offset each attendee’s carbon footprint.

Back at the Fairmont, I settle into my suite, lay back in what could easily be described as one of the most comfortable beds on Earth, ready to relax to the tunes of the complimentary “eco” CD that came with my room. What came out of the stereo can only be described as a tragic collision of native peoples and a synthesizer. I was really hoping for something cheekier — perhaps a tune by Green Day —American Idiot, for example. Or maybe When the Levee Breaks by Led Zeppelin, as that appears to be exactly what happened in New Orleans as a direct result of Global Warming. At the very least, I would have expected Joni Mitchell’s Big Yellow Taxi. Alas, that was my only perceived flaw in what is otherwise an entirely hip suite.

Even though D.C. was recently touted by the Brookings Institution as America’s most walkable city, the Fairmont provides all of its “eco-suite” guests with a complimentary Lexus LS 600h L Hybrid. While significantly less fuel-efficient than the Toyota Prius or Honda Civic Hybrid, the Lexus is an undeniably beautiful car. It is also capable of parallel parking itself, so there is no need to worry if you are an inexperienced city driver like me. As a side note, provided that you do not gorge yourself on massive amounts of factory farmed hamburgers as a result of having burned calories, it is always more environmentally friendly to walk than to drive, even if the car in question is a Lexus Hybrid. 

As an inexperienced city driver who also wanted to have a glass of wine at dinner, I left the Lexus behind when I headed for Restaurant Nora, the country’s first certified organic restaurant. In order to eliminate any doubt about the origins of your meal, Nora spells out the exact source of each item on the back of the menu. From the shade grown coffee to your waiter’s organic cotton uniform, this restaurant is serious about sustainability.

My travel companions and I were seated in a private room in the back of the restaurant next to an exposed brick wall and under a glass roof. We enjoyed seasonal dishes such as Spring Pea Soup and Asparagus Risotto, along with what appeared to be a bottomless bottle of organic wine. 

After dinner, we decided to hit a local vodka bar called Russia House. I had just finished reading a book that evaluated various countries’ happiness levels and was curious to see if there was a correlation between national bliss and the quality of vodka that a country produced. We ordered an international vodka sampler, but the results were inconclusive.

Drinks continued to appear and disappear and after a while, the conversation turned to politics. We discussed what would be the likely outcome to the then unfinished and seemingly interminable horse race between Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. It isn’t long after that the conversation turned to political scandals and the affair between New York governor Eliot Spitzer and his $3,000 prostitute. This lead us all to the inevitable conclusion that a visit to the Mayflower Hotel (the scene of the extramarital tryst) was a definite must.

We took advantage of the city’s walkability and headed over to the Mayflower on foot. Planting ourselves in the hotel’s Town and Country Lounge, we ordered some drinks and sat in the corner of the bar, enjoying the people watching and hoping for the opportunity to observe one of our elected officials in salacious disgrace. Much to our chagrin, there was no such public embarrassment, but the bar provided a lovely atmosphere to enjoy a drink anyway.

With the night coming to a close, and my head dancing from an evening of adult refreshments and thoroughly enjoyable conversation, I can’t help but think that Washington D.C. might be my favorite American city. It has something for everyone, including incredible museums (most of which are free to attend), fantastic restaurants, beautiful hotels and enough political turmoil to fuel a discussion for hours. And now I have confidence that it even offers some environmentally friendly choices for the eco-conscious traveler.

The Fairmont, Washington D.C.
2401 M Street NW
Washington, DC 20037
202.429.2400
http://www.fairmont.com/washington/

Restaurant Eve
110 South Pitt Street
Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.0450
http://www.restauranteve.com/

Restaurant Nora
2132 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20008
202.462.5143
http://www.noras.com/

The Russia House Restaurant & Lounge
1800 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20009
202.234.9433
http://www.russiahouselounge.com/

Renaissance Mayflower Hotel
1127 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20036
202.347.3000
http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/wassh-renaissance-mayflower-hotel/

Willard InterContinental Washington 
1401 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
202.628.9100
http://www.washington.intercontinental.com/

June 25, 2009

The 2007 Farm Bill

Filed under: Food — admin @ 2:59 pm

The 2007 Farm Bill is about to make its way through Congress, so if you enjoy eating food, drinking clean water and stimulating your local economy, listen up. Now is the perfect time to get involved. Already members of the Congressional Subcommittee on Agriculture, three of whom are Georgians, have begun putting together the budget for this important piece of legislation. They need to hear from us.

Our current farm policy is breathtaking in its inadequacies; however, the tide may be turning. With a dramatic increase in influential media coverage on issues surrounding food, a notable amount of concern from consumers and continual pressure from the World Trade Organization to cut commodity subsidies, the government may be taking steps to pass one of its most progressive Farm Bills in the past 50 years.

A Brief History

US farm policy was originally intended to support farmers and ensure that America would never go hungry. Over time, however, the government’s approach has descended into an ineffective strategy for achieving either of these goals.

Before the 1970’s, the USDA supported farmers by stepping in whenever there was a bumper crop and purchasing a certain amount of the harvest, which they would then store for use in the event of future crop failures. By doing this, they ensured that there would never be a glut on the market that would drive prices too low. But in 1974, USDA Secretary, Earl Butz, completely dismantled the government’s practice of agricultural surplus management, and developed fiscal incentives for our farmers to plant from “fencepost to fencepost.” His program established certain commodity crops (corn, soy beans, cotton, rice and wheat) for which the government paid farmers directly regardless of the year’s yield. This led farmers to ramp up production of these crops as much as possible, ignoring the market entirely.

The subsidies guarantee that, despite an almost continual surplus of commodities that drives market value down until it is well below the cost of production, farmers will continue to grow them in greater quantities year after year in order to get their government check. In other words, farmers are being compensated by the American tax payer to grow something we do not want and cannot use. Is this what Americans mean when they praise the free market?

Supporting our Farmers

The Farm Bill’s shortcomings don’t stop at the taxpayer. A major goal of US Farm policy is to support growers, but over the past century, America has lost 70% of its farms to bankruptcy or consolidation. The wealthiest 10% of farmers receive 72% of all direct payment subsidies, and according to the USDA’s own economic report from March 2006, “93% of farm households have negative farm operating profits, on average, and draw most of their income from off-farm sources.”
The “get big or get out” mentality under which we are currently operating, has forced most small farmers out of business while multinational agribusinesses continue to grow. As this consolidation continues, the few large farms that remain are actively encouraged by our government to industrialize their production through commodity crop monocultures. Farming this way requires vast amounts of petroleum-based fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides in order to replace the natural health that a biologically diverse system provides. Chemical inputs have devastating consequences on our health and the environment. They also contribute to America’s dependence on foreign oil. As a result of chemical use and long distance food transportation, our agriculture industry now consumes 1/5 of the total oil used in the United States.

Feeding the Nation

Another goal of the farm bill is to ensure that our country will always have food. However, due to government incentives that encourage the production of commodities instead of food, 200 million acres of farmland in this country are dedicated to producing crops that we cannot or should not eat. The majority of commodity grain grown in this country is fed to animals. What is left over is most often processed into junk foods like high fructose corn syrup, which are primary contributors to our notorious obesity and diabetes epidemics. As a direct result of our food policy, 1 in 3 Caucasian children and 1 in 2 African American and Hispanic children, born in 2000, will develop diabetes in his or her lifetime, most before they graduate from high school.

Meanwhile food security is also on the decline. According to the USDA’s Foreign Agriculture Trade of the United States (FATUS) March 2007 Summary, this country is about to become a net importer of food for the first time in generations. We are importing vegetables and fruits from across the globe while we waste valuable farmland here growing crops that don’t make fiscal or ecological sense. At the same time, small scale farmers, who grow produce are going bankrupt because there is no infrastructure to sell their food, an issue which the farm bill should address.

Room for Change

There is hope, however. Several factors have made change inevitable. One is a continued pressure from the World Trade Organization to cut federal subsidies which make it impossible for developing countries to compete on the world food market. Because of this, the administration has submitted what many consider to be a fairly progressive proposal for the 2007 Farm Bill. The new proposal calls for the following:

• An increase of $7.8 billion for conservation financing
• An increase of $5 billion for fruit, vegetable and “specialty” growers
• Farmers making more than $200,000 would no longer be eligible to receive direct payments.
• $1.6 billion for research and development on cellulosic ethanol from agricultural waste and nonfood crops
• Commodity payments based on low yields instead of low commodity prices.

While this proposal is a positive step, it can and should go farther. As it is, however, it faces serious challenges from several key Senators. Chief among them are Georgia’s own Senators, Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chamblis who believe that the current farm policy should not be changed. Without pressure from their constituencies, Congress will assuredly step into line with industrial agribusiness, which has a definite interest in making sure the current policies stay in place. A House vote on the Bill is slated for late Summer or Fall. In the mean time, whether you are a farmer or a consumer, please contact your Senators and Congressmen and let them know where you stand on healthy foods and sustainable agriculture.

Concerned Citizen Wish List

1) Sustainable and Organic Production – With demand for organic food growing every day, the farm bill should make increasing supply a priority. We support funding for resources, research and education for farmers who are transitioning to organic production. We also support the full funding of programs like ATTRA (Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas) and NCAT (National Center for Appropriate Technology) which provide valuable information and educational services to farmers who want to grow more sustainably and/or organically.

2) Conservation – All working land conservation programs, including the Conservation Security Program (CSP) and the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) which reward growers who farm responsibly should be fully funded and open to all. Currently 75% of applicants are denied access to these programs. We propose doubling the budget to $3 billion in order to open the door to more growers. Additionally the application process should be simplified and streamlined to eliminate multiple forms, redundant entries and confusing program regulations.

3) New Farmers – We advocate the funding of a new farmer and rancher grant program that would provide financial assistance to new small-scale farmers who want to buy land and farm it in an environmentally responsible way as defined by current USDA conservation programs.

4) Infrastructure – We support $1 billion in funding for the development of local infrastructure for small scale farmers. This would include, but not be limited to, the development and marketing of farmer’s markets, community supported agriculture schemes, community gardens, and small scale processing.

5) Public Health – We propose funding to support the purchase of fresh, local and organic foods by public schools, hospitals and nursing homes. Large scale consumers should be able to purchase food from their own communities in order to build local economies and serve the health needs of those dependant on their services.

This story was adapted from an article I wrote for Georgia Organics, a Georgia-based non-profit supporting healthy foods, farms and families

June 23, 2009

Destination Passion

Filed under: Travel — admin @ 4:30 pm

This article was published in the March/April 2009 issue of travelgirl magazine.

Chris Rock once said, “You can either be married and bored or single and lonely. Ain’t no happiness nowhere.” But I prefer a more positive outlook. No matter where you find yourself on the continuum of interpersonal relationships, there is a possibility for romance. While single people may have the freedom to be adventurous and explore, married couples have stability and the potential for a deeper level of intimacy. Dr. Susan Lee, a romance therapist and certified clinical sex therapist from Palm Beach, Florida, agrees. “Intense intimacy and eroticism take practice. That’s why adults are always capable of greater intimacy than adolescents.” This doesn’t necessarily imply married adults, mind you. But, theoretically, as couples grow older together, they have the opportunity to develop a more profound romantic understanding of one another.

Dr. Lee should know. She founded the Florida Postgraduate Sex Therapy Training Institute, where she trains other therapists how to counsel couples that are experiencing problems in their relationships. She also leads seminars in various cities around the world, and I recently had the pleasure of attending one.

While it may be true that eroticism can intensify with age, romance, particularly in long-term relationships, requires a little work. In many cases, it’s work that people with busy schedules and children have little time for. It’s a familiar story. People with children often report they are too tired at the end of the day to make love to each other.

Many couples make excuses for unfulfilling sex lives because the other aspects of their marriage are perfectly sound. But Dr. Lee warns this is dangerous territory. “If you don’t have sex in a relationship, if you don’t have intimacy, you have anger,” she said. And anger, unfortunately, often leads to infidelity or divorce, but it doesn’t always have to.

Dr. Lee, who has been practicing therapy since 1981, believes couples can iron out their differences, and thinks there are very practical reasons to do so. “The trend is for people to work on their relationships, not to get divorced. People are concerned about their finances and their families.” She says if the relationship is a priority, it can be revitalized.

Although, Dr. Lee’s seminars are very clinical, attending one would probably help a lot of couples put their problems into perspective. I spent an entire day listening to a dizzying array of sexual dilemmas and how to address them. We talked about premature ejaculation, erectile dysfunction, women who can’t achieve orgasm, anal sex, gender identity and transgender body issues, sex addiction, pornography, penile implants and how self-stimulation is vital for sexual health. By the end of it, I felt as though I’d just spent eight hours wading through the unrelenting landscape of Woody Allen’s id.

But despite these overtly progressive and sexually liberated themes, what was particularly interesting to me was a certain backlash against feminism. “Women didn’t do themselves any favors when they stopped having sex because they weren’t in the mood,” said Elaine Wilco, an Atlanta-based family counselor. “For a lot of women desire follows arousal. Have sex because it’s good for you not because you are in the mood.”

This shocked me, frankly, but marriage counselors seem to dispense this sort of advice regularly. A married friend of mine received similar guidance from her therapist. “Take one for the team,” she said. “It will make you both happier.”

Another of feminism’s universal truths is that women will never be equal in the workplace until men are equal at home. To their credit, some men understand this and have taken it upon themselves to be more active in their children’s lives. For the most dedicated, this starts on day one, when they witness their child’s birth.

The men at this seminar had strong opinions about that, however. “It’s like when a judge tells a jury to disregard what they’ve just heard and strike it from the record,” said Lawrence Siegel, a Clinical Sex Therapist and one of the leaders of the seminar. “How do you do that?”  Apparently even liberal, well-educated men with advanced understanding of science and psychology can’t get past the idea of their lover turning into a mother. To put it bluntly, there are a lot of men who find this metamorphosis to be a complete turn-off. According to these experts, it’s something you should consider before inviting your husband into the labor room.

After children are born, there are still plenty of obstacles to contend with. I asked Dr. Lee to outline some of the issues that may arise after giving birth, and here’s what she said:

“While you are pregnant, some women are hot and sexual. You love your breasts, and you may be highly orgasmic because the baby is pressing down on your pelvis. You are a walking hormone.” However the body changes after a baby is born. She describes the change as emotional and biochemical. Hormone levels decline dramatically, and breast-feeding dulls sexual desire.

There’s also the obvious lifestyle change. “You are frustrated and angry because you didn’t know how hard it was going to be and you want your husband to help and he doesn’t,” Dr. Lee continued. “The men are also upset because they haven’t had sex for 4 weeks…

“And some women feel they need to take care of their baby and if they take care of themselves or their husbands, they are abandoning their baby.

“My advice to them is to schedule a date. Take one hour a week – and I tell them, you have to sleep with your husband, and if you don’t choose to sleep with him, you have to cuddle and get him off.”

I asked Dr. Lee if she thought these dates eliminated any sense of spontaneity. She said, “I don’t believe in spontaneity. Not after a child.” She believes that you must work on intimacy. You cannot wait for it to happen on its own, because it never will.  People’s lives are busy. If you are always surrounded by other people, including children, family and friends, you will lose the connection with your partner.

“People don’t realize how important the honeymoon phase is. They take their kids on vacation with them. They don’t look at each other,” she said. So set a date night for once a week, and if you really want to renew your relationship, consider a vacation, but leave the kids at home.

Certainly a vacation doesn’t have to be fancy. It really just needs to allow time to reconnect with your partner. Dr. Lee stresses the importance of kissing, touching and caressing. What’s most important is being mindful of one another and trying to remember what it was like at the beginning of the relationship.

This can be done just as easily in a cabin in the mountains as it can in Hawaii or Tahiti. And couples shouldn’t wait until they have the time and money to take a second honeymoon. Rather take a weekend (soon) and lock yourself up with your partner.

Of course, for some couples a vacation won’t be a cure all. If you are really experiencing difficulties in your marriage and want to take steps toward a more fulfilling sex life with your partner, you should consider seeing a professional counselor. “Therapy is about change,” said Dr. Lee. “And if you are committed to change, you can make your marriage healthy again. I see it happen all the time.”

For psychotherapists, psychologists and physicians who are interested in becoming certified in Clinical Sex Therapy, or would like to attend one of Dr. Lee’s seminars to receive continuing education credit, please visit her website: http://www.floridasextherapyinstitute.org/.

June 20, 2009

The Oily Politics of Corn

Filed under: Food — admin @ 8:10 pm

I first heard about biodeisel from an alternative fuels magnate here in Atlanta. And by “alternative fuels magnate,” I mean anti-corporate anarchist. My heart skipped a beat as he explained to me in detail how you can turn used grease from fast food restaurants into energy. Wide use of this technology would mean a completely renewable local fuel source – no war required. Needless to say, I became a huge proponent of the stuff. I thought it was the answer to our problems. Rather than spending between $100 and $150 billion overseas every year supporting various dictators and other would-be evil-doers, we can produce everything we need right here, support our local economy and simultaneously turn a McMuffin into something patriotic.

Make no mistake, its potential as a renewable energy source does not absolve the fast food industry for what it’s done to the American palate, not to mention its waistline. And fast food restaurants, alone, will not be able to support America’s overfed oil addiction, at least not unless we drastically increase the national level of french fry consumption. If America truly wants to free itself from dependence on foreign oil through biofuels, there will have to be other sources.

And that seems to be just what our politicians are looking at right now. Everyone from George W. Bush to Barack Obama seems to be on the ethanol bandwagon these days. But corn ethanol, as bright a future as it seems to have, is not quite as ecologically efficient as a Wendy’s grease trap.

In order to explain why corn ethanol may not be the panacea that everyone is hoping for, let’s take a brief look at the history of corn.

At $23 billion a year, corn is America’s number one cash crop. There are many contributing factors to corn’s central role in America’s heartland, but by far the most significant is government subsidies.

Before the 1970’s, the USDA supported farmers by stepping in whenever there was a bumper crop and purchasing a certain amount of the harvest, which they would then store for use in the event of future crop failures. By doing this, they ensured that there would never be a glut on the market that would drive prices too low. But in 1974, our then USDA Secretary, Earl Butz, completely dismantled the government’s practice of agricultural surplus management, and developed fiscal incentives for our farmers to plant from “fencepost to fencepost.” His program, which is the one currently in use, established certain commodity crops for which the government paid farmers directly regardless of the year’s yield. This led farmers to ramp up their production of these crops as much as possible by converting their farms into giant monocultures fueled by massive amounts of chemical fertilizers.

The subsidies guarantee that, despite an almost continual glut of corn that drives market value down until it is well below the cost of production, farmers will continue to grow it in greater quantities year after year in order to get their government check. In other words, farmers are being compensated by the American tax payer to grow something we do not want and cannot use. Eat your heart out, Adam Smith.

Due to this unending surplus, agribusiness corporations, like Arthur Daniels Midland, are keen to come up with new and exciting ways to squeeze more money out of their golden goose. And the latest craze seems to be to convert it into fuel. However, from an ecological standpoint, this really makes no sense. Conservative estimates have said that if every single ear of corn grown in the United States was used for the production of ethanol, it would only offset 12% of our crude oil use. If you count the petroleum that is required to produce ethanol (from farming to transporting to processing), it would only account for 3% of our oil needs. Less conservative estimates have declared the entire process a net loss. (Z Magazine Online, “Will the new Congress act to change our disastrous energy policy?”, Brian Tokar, January 3, 2007)

Still, there is a potential for success in the world of vegetable fuels. It’s just that it doesn’t lie with corn. Alternative plants, which have no digestive value, may be more suited to the task of creating biofuel. Some varieties of algae, for example, are 60% oil by content. Algae is a quick-growing crop that can be farmed on salt ponds in the middle of the desert. It requires no arable land, and it doesn’t even require fresh water. It does well in highly polluted areas and can be cultivated on waste streams (either human waste or animal waste from feedlots).

The DOE’s Office of Fuels Development, conducted a study known as the Aquatic Species Program, which detailed the potential for algae as a combination waste water treatment and biofuels feedstock. The study confirmed that Algae could supply substantially more biofuel than existing oilseed crops could. Microalgae are capable of producing 30 times the amount of oil per unit area of land than their terrestrial counterparts. According to Michael Briggs, a physicist at the University of New Hampshire, we could completely eliminate our need for crude oil if we dedicated 28.5 million acres of otherwise non-arable land to algae. Compare that to the roughly 16 million acres of perfectly good farm land that are presently being used to grow corn for ethanol. That 16 million acres hasn’t done much to alleviate our reliance on foreign oil (See Iraq War).

I don’t want to suggest that algae is a silver bullet. It isn’t. But doesn’t it make more sense to put research money into something that

• doesn’t take up valuable land
• produces more oil than any known alternative
• can be used simultaneously as a waste water treatment

than it does to invest in corn monocultures, which are demonstrably wasteful and harmful to our ecosystem? If you answered yes, you may want to take it up with your congressman. In 1998, the Department of Energy completely eliminated the Aquatic Species Program and our Congress continues to write legislation that supports the research and development of corn ethanol.

When it comes to agriculture in this country, it always seems like there is a better solution than the one Washington gives us. Corn ethanol seems to be nothing more than a reallocation of our tax dollars. It does very little to address a serious issue the nation is facing.

It is the classic one-two punch. We take something that we don’t need and turn it into something we waste and the American tax payer loses money every step of the way. It would be nice if this country would have a meaningful discussion about our immanent oil crisis. But, unfortunately, until alternative agriculture can develop enough financial and political power to compete with the National Corn Growers Association, we may be a long way from a biological solution to this problem.

June 19, 2009

Green Your Eats

Filed under: Food — admin @ 4:28 pm

This is the unedited version of a story that was published in Restaurant Forum Magazine, a Georgia-based trade publication. It was subsequently blended with another woman’s article who for some reason was assigned a similar topic.

As any good chef knows, there is more than one way to skin a small furry animal. That’s why local chefs address the responsibility of greening their kitchens in the same way they approach their daily specials: with profound creativity and respect for the limitless possibilities. Whether the goal is to conserve energy, cut down on waste, or meet the ever-growing expectation of diners who believe that their meals should first, do no harm, the paths to achieve success are myriad, as are the rewards.

One of the quickest ways to reduce the environmental impact of a restaurant is to replace old, wasteful equipment with new energy efficient technologies. That is exactly what Chef Patrick Gebrayel, of the Dunwoody Country Club, had in mind when he decided to renovate his kitchen. He made energy efficiency his top priority. From high output fluorescent lighting to an insulated Meiko dishwasher that runs on 60% less water than their previous model, Gebrayel’s kitchen is not only environmentally friendly, it’s much less expensive to run. “A gas pilot runs about $400 to $500 a year. We just went from 24 pilots to 12. That’s going to be a savings of $6,000 annually.” 

Gebrayel also replaced his oven, flat top griddle and deep fryers with newer insulated models. Now the heat stays where it is needed and doesn’t escape into the kitchen. This reduces air conditioning bills and makes for a more comfortable staff. But, while newer technologies can definitely lower energy consumption, BTUs are not the only measure of a kitchen’s sustainability. 

Chef Gebrayel also tries to reduce his carbon footprint by sourcing from local growers. According to Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma, “one-fifth of America’s petroleum consumption goes to producing and transporting our food.” By supporting local, small-scale, sustainable farmers, who do not use chemical fertilizers and pesticides, a restaurant can reduce its environmental impact significantly. Buying local food also improves local economies and creates a sense of accountability that Gebrayel says consumers are looking for. “I think that after the spinach recall, people should have had a wake up call. Buying local just makes sense.”

Dennis Lange, co-owner of 5 Seasons Brewing, agrees. “I used to laugh at people who were more concerned about the quality of gasoline they put in their cars than the food they put in their bodies. But we’re coming around. We’ll get it sooner or later.” 

5 Seasons, a restaurant and brewpub that describes itself as “fine dining – in denim” has been a model for the local/sustainable movement. By working with local growers, Executive Chef David Larkworthy, has been producing menus based on seasonality since they opened in 2001.

Lange and Larkworthy first began seeking out farmers because they needed a place to dispose of spent grains after brewing their beers. “We could have sold the grains as feed for pigs and cows, but we did a study with a group from UGA and found that turning it into compost is like Gatorade for plants. It’s vitamin B rich, which means it promotes strong root growth and higher yields.”

Daniel Parsons, the farm manager at Gaia Gardens, and the main beneficiary of 5 Seasons’ compost program, is thankful for what they do. Over the years, 5 Seasons and Gaia Gardens have established a trading relationship. “We try to give them produce every time they come down here, so they’ll keep bringing the grains. That’s our main source of fertility.” 

Parsons has also made it a point to grow the produce that 5 Seasons likes to use.  Each year, he plants Sun Gold Tomatoes, and Lange comes down to hand pick the vine-ripened fruit himself. “For them, it’s about relationships and closing the food circle from production to consumption. It’s about knowing where the food on your plate came from.”

5 Seasons is not unique in its ability to help farmers. Composting is something all food service professionals can do. Whole Foods has recently instituted a composting program for the green wastes from their kitchens. They’ve also taken steps to replace their salad bar containers with biocompostable to-go boxes. All of their compostable packaging “is made from natural fibers that come from crops grown and harvested annually,” according to Scott Crawford, Whole Food’s Prepared Foods Coordinator for the South Region. Materials derived from annual plants are much more sustainable than paper products, because even farmed trees take between ten and twenty years to replenish.

Once prohibitively expensive, compostable to-go products have recently become a more competitive alternative to traditional disposables. Fulton Paper, a local distributor that provides food service packaging, now carries two different lines of compostable disposables. One is made from polylactic acid (derived from corn kernels) and is used for cold applications. The other is made from bagasse, or sugar cane stalks, and can take up to 140 degrees Fahrenheit. Both of these products will biodegrade in four to six weeks on their own, but with the help of a brand new technology, the time required can drop to as little as one day.

The ORCA (Organic Refuse Conversion Alternative) is a high-speed composting machine, available exclusively through Fulton Paper. According to Madoc Rhys, Director of food service disposables, “this machine can convert up to 2,400 pounds of organic matter into enriched water in 24 hours.” It uses 40 gallons of water per day, and converts the material input into 130 gallons of water. At 2,400 pounds a day, this machine can significantly lower labor time and garbage bills. It also eliminates the odors associated with rotting garbage and adds water back to Georgia’s diminishing water table.

Turning garbage into fertile soil and water is a great way to reduce landfill waste, but when it comes to recycling organic materials, chefs need look no further than their deep fryers. Experts agree that using the Frialator’s leftovers to make biodiesel is an excellent use of resources. And now, thanks to a new business venture, spearheaded by the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, all restaurants have an opportunity to turn their used grease into gasoline.  The program is simple. S.A.C.E. collects used cooking oil produced in local kitchens at no cost to the restaurant and processes it into biodiesel, which they then sell. All profits benefit this non-partisan, organization in its mission to promote responsible energy choices that solve global warming problems and ensure clean, safe and healthy communities throughout the Southeast. Because the oil can be considered a donation to a 501c-3, restaurants can count it as a 100% tax write off.

For more information on this easy way to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and help reduce green house gas emissions, visitwww.refuelbiodiesel.org.

If you would like more information on how to find local growers, please contact Georgia Organics, www.georgiaorganics.org, a local non-profit whose mission is to integrate local, healthy, sustainable foods into the lives of all Georgians.

For more information on energy efficient appliances, contact Tom Wixson, jrwixson@southernco.com, 404.506.7134, of Georgia Power and visit one of his statewide demo kitchens.

To find out more about the Organic Refuse Conversion Alternative, visit www.greenguardassociates.com or contact Madoc Rhys at Fulton Paper, madoc.rhys@fultonpaper.com

April 26, 2009

King & Spalding Newcomen Award Speech

Filed under: Speeches — admin @ 4:58 pm

I prepared this address, dealing with the history of King & Spalding LLP, for Walter W. Driver, Chairman of King & Spalding. He delivered it as the guest of honor and speaker at a “2004 Georgia Meeting” of The Newcomen Society of the United States held in Atlanta, Georgia.

IS AN HONOR to be introduced by Phil, whom I’ve known for 30 years. In our early days, we spent many weekends camped out in one of our offices, working on various transactions forSunTrust. Our families used to wonder what could possibly be taking up so much of our weekend time. These days, our families still wonder why we disappear for long stretches on weekends. We’re still negotiating transactions, but the work is more pleasant, and mostly involves Phil negotiating for more strokes on the first tee.

I thank all of you for joining us tonight for cocktails and dinner. We were very honored when The Newcomen Society, which for over 80 years has studied and recognized achievements in American business, approached King & Spalding about presenting the history of its business and receiving a Newcomen Award. I am very pleased you are all here to share it with us.

King & Spalding has a proud history spanning nearly 120 years. Since the time it was formed by Alex King and Jack Spalding as a twoman partnership in 1885, our firm has grown substantially. As Phil noted, we are now located in five cities, have an international presence, employ more than 800 lawyers, and represent two-thirds of the Fortune 100 companies.

It is an interesting story — how we got from there to here — one I will lay out in some detail shortly. But I want to emphasize that the keys to our success and expansion can be quickly and simply summed up — we have grown as our clients have grown. Our expansion — in expertise, depth, size and geography — is based upon our building strategic relationships with our clients, understanding not just their legal needs but also their business goals, and by adapting and growing in ways that help them achieve those goals.

This is the story of King & Spalding — a story that, you will see, is just as much a story about our clients as it is about us.

MODEST BEGINNINGS FOR A TWO-PERSON TEAM

The story begins with Alex King and Jack Spalding, both born in 1856, who met in Atlanta and formed a partnership here on January 1, 1885.

Alexander King was a scholar, a brilliant academic and a walking encyclopedia of the law. In fact, when times were slow he elected to sit down and employ his photographic memory by memorizing all 59 volumes of the Georgia Reports. Yet, although he possessed a spongelike mind and brilliant legal capabilities, he was timid and retiring, which inhibited his ability to attract clients.

Jack Spalding, on the other hand, was a people person, a gregarious businessman and an adept negotiator. He preferred to be the one to interview clients, and then later consult with Alex, who could instantly recall the exact page number and location of applicable law. These two men complemented each other perfectly and set an example of teamwork and scholarship that continues in our partnership to this day.

When King & Spalding set up our first office at 6½ Whitehall Street, now called Peachtree Street — and I have no idea how small it must have been to be at “6½,” maybe a door at street level and a walk up — the building had no steam heat or facilities, so Alex King and Jack Spalding took turns coming in early to start the fire and bring in a bucket of drinking water. Their financial arrangement was simple: They placed legal fees in a drawer and split their collections before going home at night. Compensation of partners, as we all know, has become slightly more complicated since then.

King & Spalding’s legal work in its first 30 or so years focused on serving railroad, water and electrical clients as these entities began to merge and consolidate with other companies in their respective industries. In 1911, for example, the firm took a fee of one million dollars worth of stock for advising on the consolidation of a new company, later known as the Georgia Power Company.

At this point in its history, the firm was still just a two-person partnership. Several years later, though, that would change as the firm took on a client that would stimulate significant growth in our firm, a client that we continue to have a close, productive relationship with to this day — The Coca-Cola Company.

COCA-COLA FUELS FIRM’S INITIAL GROWTH

The Coca-Cola Company was started just a few blocks from here when its product was poured for the first time at the corner of Peachtree and Marietta Streets, one year after King & Spalding was founded. Asa Candler purchased The Coca-Cola Company two years later and proved to be a business and advertising genius; however, he believed the drink was best served from the fountain. He did not agree that the drink could be bottled and enjoyed later, a concept that two entrepreneurs from Chattanooga, who also happened to be lawyers, aggressively pushed.

Candler was skeptical that bottling Coke would succeed, but he finally signed a contract for bottling the beverage that was destined to become one of the most important business documents in history. His final comment was: “If you boys fail in the undertaking, don’t come back to cry on my shoulder, because I have very little confidence in the bottling business.”

In 1919, Ernest Woodruff bought the company from Asa Candler and determined he could cancel the bottlers’ contract that had been signed 20 years before. The bottlers were incensed at Woodruff’s action and hired King & Spalding to file suit against The Coca-Cola Company. John Sibley, who had joined King & Spalding in 1918, became the lead counsel for the bottlers and promptly won a ruling in their favor. On appeal, the presiding judge called in the lawyers from both sides and said they best settle, because whichever side he ruled against would face certain financial ruin. Jack Spalding was called in to negotiate a settlement between the two parties, which he did.

The story goes that when he was elected the new president of Coca-Cola, Robert Woodruff, Ernest’s son, said, “I don’t want to see that son of a bitch John Sibley on the other side ever again.” And that is how we got hired by Coca-Cola.

After Jack Spalding’s retirement and later his death in 1938, his son Hughes Spalding assumed management of the firm. Hughes’ hiring had not been easy. When he first applied for a job with King & Spalding in 1912, his father told him the firm was looking for lawyers, not sons. Hughes went to work elsewhere to prove his worth. Hughes became even more involved in the affairs of the city and state, spending much of his time negotiating on behalf of clients at the state capitol.

Now, I would like to focus on five examples of our working for The Coca-Cola Company that I think appropriately illustrate the wide range of work we have done on the company’s behalf over the years.

One challenge concerned the intangible tax law that chased many businesses out of state, including The Coca-Cola Company, which had moved to Delaware. Hughes Spalding launched a lengthy public relations campaign to change the law. He engaged a writer to fill the state’s 87 daily and weekly newspapers with two different columns. The column opposing reform was filled with exclamation points, bold type, italics and strident language. The other, written by the same man but under a pen name, was more gentle and logical in tone. I guess you could say it was “fair and balanced.” These columns ran for months while Hughes worked the legislature. Eventually, the state’s editors began to adopt his position. Finally after a four-year effort, the intangible tax was relaxed and later a 3 percent sales tax was substituted. The Coca-Cola Company, which had hired John Sibley as its general counsel and moved him and its headquarters to Delaware, returned to Atlanta for good. Other firms followed. After working on this campaign for years, Hughes Spalding wrote Robert Woodruff, “as a friend, please don’t give me any more jobs that can’t be wound up in a day or two.” Fortunately for us, Mr. Woodruff didn’t listen to Hughes. I am told that Hughes once said, “The political history of Georgia is written in my checkbook.”

John Sibley’s son, Jimmy (here tonight), started with King & Spalding in 1942 and served as our relationship partner with both Coca-Cola and the Trust Company of Georgia — as SunTrust was then known — until his retirement in 1992, and as a long-time director for both companies. He recalls that the firm was on retainer with Coca-Cola and one day one of its administrative officers came and said, “We pay you a retainer to be on call, and we want to quit doing that.” Jimmy said, “Why don’t you keep paying it and just let us earn it by giving us more work?” The company gave us a lot more work.

King & Spalding has worked with Coca-Cola on everything from legislative policy to acquisitions to the incorporation of its many family foundations. A second example of our working with Coca-Cola is from 1979, when King & Spalding opened its first out-of-state office in Washington, D.C., primarily because Coca-Cola asked us to represent it in food and drug issues there. Today, King & Spalding’s Washington, D.C. office has grown to 120 lawyers and continues to handle a significant amount of work for Coca-Cola and many other clients. It has built strong teams focusing on regulatory matters and complex litigation. Our Washington, D.C. office is also known for its skilled special matters and governmental investigations group, founded by Griffin Bell, and has earned recognition for its international trade capabilities.

Third, we represented The Coca-Cola Company in extremely contentious litigation regarding the rights of the Company to alter the pricing of concentrate based on sugar or fructose prices. This is obviously a key element to the profitability of concentrate sales.

Fourth, we represented the Company in connection with the acquisition of several large bottling interests and the formation of Coca-Cola Enterprises — now its largest domestic bottler and distributor.

Fifth, we represented the Company in its acquisition of carbonated brands from Cadbury Schweppes in Great Britain, Eastern Europe, Asia, South America and Africa, the worldwide nonalcoholic Seagrams beverage business, the distribution rights for Evian bottled water and a variety of beverage brands ranging from Barq’s to Inca Kola as the Company expanded beyond its historical products and markets.

On a personal note, I remember in 1986 handling for Coke the closing of the Coca-Cola Enterprises deal in which, ironically, Coca-Cola purchased back many of those same bottlers that we had represented back in 1920 and then spun them off into Coca-Cola Enterprises. The deal carried a $3.5 billion financing, the largest debt deal for us up to that time. I remember saying at the closing as I signed the legal opinion, “I sure hope this works.” I’m happy to say tonight that it definitely has.

So you see, we have grown with the Company as the relationships with its key bottlers have expanded and changed and as its product mix has grown.

Our former partners, John Sibley, Robert Troutman, Pope Brock, and Joe Gladden all served as General Counsel of Coca-Cola, and John Sibley and both our retired partners, Jimmy Sibley and Sam Nunn, served on the Board of Directors.

Today, Coke is still the most famous worldwide brand and if you are a lawyer and out in the world and say you are from Atlanta, the first question people ask is, “Do you represent Coke?” Being able to say “yes” is extremely important for our credibility in world markets.

TRANSACTIONAL WORK BRINGS EXPANDED OPPORTUNITIES IN MAJOR

Phil’s presence tonight and generally gracious behavior confirms that SunTrust Banks is another longtime, admired client. In the 1920s, our firm represented the Atlanta National Bank, which merged with the Trust Company of Georgia and the Lowry National Bank. As Phil noted, when federal banking laws changed, we handled Trust Company’s separation into its own entity and have represented it ever since. Tragedy struck the bank’s executive suite in 1946 when both its president and chairman were diagnosed with cancer and died within three months of each other. John Sibley, who had recently returned to King & Spalding from his position with Coca-Cola in Delaware, was reluctantly pressed into accepting both positions at the bank.

When Trust Company merged with Sun Banks and formed SunTrust in 1985, we handled that transaction and the significant merger transactions that followed: Third National in Tennessee, Crestar in Virginia and, most recently, National Commerce in Tennessee and North Carolina. The Sun Banks merger impacted us beyond the transaction. It made us focus upon our future and led to a significant shift in how our law firm viewed itself. We were no longer an Atlanta law firm with a Washington, D.C. office. We, however, declined to become a Southeastern firm with offices in Orlando or Charlotte, and instead set our ambitions on becoming a national law firm headquartered in Atlanta that supported our clients outside of Georgia when their business took them there.

In 1998 when SunTrust was acquiring Crestar, SunTrust was advised by a New York investment firm to interview and retain a big New York-based law firm. I am pleased to report that they did not. The strength of our relationship with SunTrust — as well as my not-so-gentle prodding of Phil Humann — helped ensure that we were SunTrust’s firm of choice. We continue today as lead outside counsel for SunTrust.

PRODUCTS LIABILITY WORK DRIVES GROWTH IN 1960S

General Motors is another client with which we have grown and adjusted as its needs have evolved. Our relationship with GM dates back to the 1960s. Hughes Spalding was in the Knights of the Malta (remember, we were viewed in those early days as a “Catholic” law firm) with the general counsel of GM, and through that relationship, we were hired to handle workers compensation claims at GM’s two plants in the Atlanta area.

Byron Attridge served as relationship partner to GM for many years. Our legal work for GM increased after one of Byron’s classmates at Princeton, a fellow by the name of Ralph Nader, published a book called “Unsafe At Any Speed.” The book, about the Corvair, prompted numerous lawsuits against GM on the issue of the car’s design. King & Spalding was selected as counsel and handled cases across the country, expanding to take on more of those cases as needed. GM became one of our largest clients, we have been one of their top five national law firms, and today products liability is one of our largest practice areas.

This expertise — fueled by GM’s litigation, by the clients who followed and by runaway populist juries in the Southeast — has propelled us into a top national practice. Chilton Varner, who is widely recognized as one of the top litigators in the country, began her practice handling product liability work for GM, and she has expanded our product liability and mass tort practice to other categories, most notably into pharmaceuticals.

In January, American Lawyer magazine named King & Spalding one of the top three products liability firms in the nation, largely due to our great success representing clients such as GM, ChevronTexaco, 3M, PurduePharma, GlaxoSmithKline and Brown & Williamson. This work is handled by lawyers in our Washington, Houston and Atlanta offices but goes back to taking care of GM.

NEW YORK STRATEGIC EXPANSION

As we began to take on a greater volume of high-dollar-value, sophisticated transactional work of strategic importance to our clients, it became evident they needed us to have a presence in the international money center of New York. So in 1992, we opened our New York office to better serve clients like SunTrust, Coke, GM, an increasing array of international clients, and many others. This became a gateway for international clients which we were beginning to develop.

After starting with a small group of attorneys just over twelve years ago, our New York office now employs 175 lawyers in a wide variety of litigation and transactional practice areas. Our New York office has established the platform to expand our services and has helped us cement relationships with many new clients, including many investment banks and others in the financial services sector. New York is a challenging market with a long list of established law firms there, but King & Spalding is making great strides in that market. We have built strong transactional teams, a top-notch securities litigation team, and just this year we added a patent litigation team in that office.

OIL ROYALTIES WORK BRINGS KING & SPALDING TO HOUSTON

ChevronTexaco is another major client with which we have had a long-term relationship that has altered the shape of the firm. The relationship began in 1989 when Judge Bell got a call from the general counsel of Texaco in White Plains, New York. The state of Louisiana had claimed Texaco underpaid royalties on oil and gas leases going back decades. Texaco, fearing its reputation (and a lot of money) was at stake, wanted to hire lead counsel of the highest integrity to defend it. They found that in one of the finest Attorneys General to ever serve this country and, at that time, a King & Spalding partner: Judge Griffin Bell. Judge Bell was joined by one of our bright young attorneys, George Branch, who today is managing partner of our London office. They settled the case in Texaco’s favor, and this positive result has led to a long, valued relationship with Texaco, now ChevronTexaco.

In early 1994, Texaco was involved in a lawsuit in the state of Texas and it wanted to hire a local firm. Texaco asked Judge Bell and George Branch to recommend Texas firms to interview, which they did. After it conducted interviews, Texaco’s general counsel called George, said he wanted us to open an office in Houston, and promised us their business. George went straight to Judge Bell’s office. Judge Bell looked up from his books briefly and said, “Sounds like a good idea.”

So in 1995, at Texaco’s request, we opened the Houston office with three litigation attorneys. When Chevron merged with Texaco, we maintained the strong relationship. In fact, the relationship that started under one general counsel has continued to grow under his three successors. We are now ChevronTexaco’s number two firm in the U.S. The success of this relationship with ChevronTexaco ranges from high stakes litigation to our industry leading expertise in liquefied natural gas. Who would have imagined that we are responsible for an Angolan LNG project for this huge international enterprise based in California? Our retired partner, Sam Nunn, serves on the board of directors. Since 1989, the firm has represented Texaco and it successor, ChevronTexaco, as national counsel in nearly 250 matters throughout the United States.

We now have more than 70 attorneys in Houston serving dozens of clients in litigation and transactional matters. The office has a particularly strong international transactional practice and is the base for our Latin American practice. We have assisted clients like Coca-Cola, Home Depot and UPS as their businesses in Latin America have grown. We would not have had our Houston office and its growth without the request by Texaco and the continued support of these other clients.

CROSSING THE BIG POND

So by the late 1990s, the firm had offices in four U.S. cities, but our clients’ needs were continuing to expand internationally. A London office became our next logical step that allowed us to expand on the international energy work coming out of our Houston office, help our clients acquire European companies, and build on key specialty practices. In 2003, the firm opened an office in London with six lawyers from various King & Spalding offices. Today, we have 16 lawyers practicing from that office and have taken on international mergers and acquisition and joint venture work for clients like General Electric, Oxford Industries and UPS, as well as cross-border financing work.

Our London office also shares expertise in the specialty area of Islamic finance and investment with our New York and Atlanta offices, and earlier this year the firm was named the top Islamic Finance legal advisor in the world by Euromoney, an international business and financial publication.

You might wonder how a firm rooted in Atlanta has become an international pioneer in the Islamic Finance field. The diligence and responsiveness of three of our partners — Don Knight, Mike McMillen and Isam Salah — are largely responsible. Each of them had been handling major transactions in the Middle East for years when, in the early 1990s, it became apparent to them that more and more of their clients needed to structure transactions that would attract substantial Middle Eastern investment by complying with Islamic law, and that there was a lack of suitable structures. Islamic law forbids Muslims from participating in some aspects of business and investing, including earning or paying interest or engaging in speculation.

They believed that, using their structuring abilities and creativity, they could develop and implement Islamically compliant transactions to help those clients. They went on to pioneer some of the most widely used Islamically compliant structures and products, and this practice has become one of the most respected in its field in the world. Who would have thought this of King & Spalding?

HELPING HOME DEPOT EXPAND

Another excellent example of how we have grown to serve our clients is Home Depot, a relative newcomer to Atlanta compared to The Coca-Cola Company and SunTrust. Founded in Atlanta in 1978, Home Depot opened with just three stores. It is now the world’s largest home improvement specialty retailer with $65 billion in sales in 2003. It is the second largest retailer in the U.S. and soon will open its 1,800th store in the U.S., Puerto Rico, Canada and Mexico.

One of our bright young lawyers, Mike Egan, handled a merger of two construction firms in 1985 and then struck up a friendship with a young CFO who later went to work at Home Depot. As Home Depot grew, its needs became more sophisticated. It began needing legal assistance with financing, store growth and acquisitions, so Home Depot called on Mike Egan.

Home Depot’s legal work has evolved from periodic merger and acquisition work to where, on any given day, numerous King & Spalding lawyers are assisting Home Depot. We handled its expansion into Mexico and a joint venture in Chile in 1997, and our continued work for them in Latin America has attracted bright young Spanishspeaking lawyers – or abogados – to join our Houston office. Mike’s work with Home Depot led to our selection by Home Depot’s cofounder, Arthur Blank, to handle Mr. Blank’s purchase of the Atlanta Falcons. Last year, Mike led another team that handled an even more complicated purchase of the Atlanta Hawks, Atlanta Thrashers and the operating rights to Philips Arena. We also represent the Houston Astros, so we have major league sports covered.

TEAMING WITH UPS

Another relative newcomer to Atlanta and King & Spalding is UPS. When UPS moved to Atlanta in the early 1990s, we had no relationship with UPS. We did a small amount of work for UPS up until 1999, when the UPS Legal Department launched a law firm convergence and consolidation initiative to reduce its outside counsel roster in the U.S. from almost 200 law firms to 25 Core Counsel firms. UPS invited over 60 top law firms from around the country to make presentations to UPS about why they should be included in the UPS Core Counsel Network. UPS is a company that prides itself on its business ethics and high standards in a fiercely competitive marketplace. Deep down, we modestly believed that we had much to offer to UPS and felt that our culture of service and dedication to our communities was similar to theirs.

Fortunately for us, UPS agreed and we are now one of their top international law firms. We have represented UPS in doing all the international trademark work for “What can Brown do for you?” and assisted in the launch of UPS’s global brand strategy. We have followed them in international expansion and acquisition, as well as corporate finance, securities, employee benefits, joint ventures, commercial and tort litigation, contracting and strategic alliances, among other areas. Our experience in partnering with UPS to promote efficiency and reduce legal costs has been a true asset of King & Spalding.

Our relationship with UPS has grown beyond the provision of legal service into the area of community service and “giving back to the community.” For example, last year UPS led all corporate givers in its support of the United Way. With the encouragement of UPS, King & Spalding became the runaway law firm leader in United Way contributions in Atlanta. We are also working jointly with UPS Legal to provide pro bono legal services to the elderly.

COMMITMENT TO COMMUNITY

Corporate clients are not the only ones who have helped this firm grow, though. Our civic and pro bono work has also benefited King & Spalding by giving us opportunities to support our community and those in need.

Our firm’s long tradition of public service can be traced back to Alex King, who was appointed by President Wilson to be Solicitor General of the United States in 1918. A few years later, King was appointed as a judge on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the same bench graced years later by Griffin Bell. King served with great distinction, and then returned to the law firm for another two years before dying in 1926. That same year, the Atlanta Public Schools System was unable to meet its payroll. Jack Spalding led an effort to fund a half-million dollar system based on scrip that allowed the teachers to transact business in the city.

This tradition of public service was continued by Hughes Spalding, who operated as a one-man governmental affairs department for several of the firm’s clients from the 1920s through the 1950s. A sampling of the organizations he chaired includes the Board of Regents, the Fulton County Democratic Executive Committee, and the Trust Company’s Trust Committee. He was the first chair of the Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority, and Atlanta’s downtown children’s hospital bears his name to this day.

Since then, our lawyers have answered the call on everything from Atlanta’s efforts to secure the 1996 Centennial Olympic Games, to its present support of quality-of-life initiatives such as the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless and the Atlanta Clean Air Campaign. Over one hundred fifty of our lawyers serve on the boards of nonprofit organizations.

We have helped death row inmates, people seeking asylum, victims of domestic violence and many others who could not otherwise afford legal assistance. We also have helped attack the difficult issues of mental health treatment for those in the criminal justice system and civil rights for prisoners. We now have two pro bono cases pending before the United States Supreme Court.

We are the only firm in the country to have provided a Solicitor General of the United States (Alex King), an Acting Solicitor General (Paul Clement from our Washington office), an Attorney General of the United States (Griffin Bell), and a Deputy Attorney General (Larry Thompson). Other partners who have served our country include the late Governor George Busbee and former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn.

Judge Bell once said, “There’s no better way to live than being a lawyer. You have a chance to serve, you have a chance to use your talents, and all in the public good.”

WORKING AS A TEAM FOR CLIENTS’ BENEFIT

While all of the attorneys at King & Spalding can boast of individual achievements, I believe the firm’s strongest attribute is its ability to work as a team for the benefit of our clients. Founder Jack Spalding once said that no one member of the firm can help contribute to their individual reputation in any better way than by helping build the firm overall. Those were farsighted words and remain true today.

We have many attorneys today who are Jack Spaldings — outgoing business people with a knack for making contacts and understanding clients’ needs; but we also have hundreds of Alex Kings — those who are outstanding scholars and work with their noses to the books to ensure our clients get the best legal advice possible.

Unlike Jack Spalding and Alex King, however, we no longer take all the money we get during the day, stick it in a drawer and split it up at the end of the day. I’m also happy to report that, today, all of our offices come complete with heat and drinking water and have full, round number addresses. But as we’ve grown from two attorneys in 1885 to more than 800 in 2004, and from serving small Georgia enterprises to representing some of the world’s largest and most respected international corporations, we have not forgotten our heritage.

And we have learned along the way:

  • That to best serve our clients, we have to listen, learn their business objectives and become contributors to their success.
  • That we are only as good as our last interaction with our clients, so nothing less than the best legal work any time we interact with a client is acceptable.
  • And that by collaborating cross-office and cross-practice as a team, our clients reap the rewards, but so do we — by creating a firm where the work is rewarding, the atmosphere is collegial and potential is unlimited.

It has been my honor to be a part of this team for 34 years and to represent King & Spalding here tonight.

Thank you.

April 28, 2008

Chillin’ with my Beach

Filed under: Travel — admin @ 3:41 pm

This article was published in the April/May 2008 issue of travelgirl magazine

Getting to the aptly named, Dream Beach, is not particularly easy, but then, for those willing to fly half way around the world to Bali, a little extra traveling shouldn’t be a deal breaker. I set sail for the island of Nusa Lembongan, just east of Bali, on a tiny fisherman’s boat that accommodated precisely three people. The captain sat quietly in the stern and smoked clove cigarettes, as he navigated our way across the open sea, and my travel companion and I crouched in the hull. Upon docking, we hopped off the side of the boat and sloshed across the water to get to the beach, where we promptly began haggling with the local boys for a motorcycle ride. Dream beach is not accessible by boat.

Jumping on the back of a bike and hurdling through the jungle on dirt roads rife with potholes we finally crested a hill and looked down to see the most beautiful, isolated, white sand beach I ever could have hoped to find. And situated on that beach is exactly one hotel, named for its lovely location – the Dream Beach Bungalow. It’s pretty and cheap. $20 a night will get you a gorgeous thatched roof bungalow with a queen-sized bed enveloped in a mosquito net, and a private outdoor shower. It will also get you a nearly isolated beach, surrounded by pristine farmland, populated by free-range chickens and the occasional lazy cow.

The adjoining restaurant and bar, café Pandan, serve up some of the best food to be found in Bali. Pepes Ikan (steamed fish wrapped in banana leaves) and Nasi Goering (fried rice, topped with an egg) are ubiquitous fare in this part of the world, but this restaurant takes pride in their national dishes and serves them with care, perfectly spiced. You can enjoy your dinner with your toes in the sand, or reclining on a couch on the second floor overlooking the ocean.

You won’t find discos or banana boat rides here. You also won’t find hoards of other tourists. But if you’re lucky, you will find a few fellow travelers, who like you have come to kick back, enjoy a few Bintang beers and relax in this beautiful, private wonderland.

Phone: +62 (0) 8123983772

Duck’s Cosmic Kitchen

Filed under: Food — admin @ 3:16 pm

The following story was published in the Spring issue of Edible Atlanta Magazine

Duck’s Cosmic Kitchen began as nothing more than a tiny catering kitchen from which culinary gems sprang into existence and were promptly shipped off to various parties throughout the city. But it was forced to expand when the alluring aroma of truly gorgeous treats, ranging the spectrum from savory to sweet, wafted through the air and caught the noses of workers at neighboring businesses.

Flattering though it was that patrons were soon stuffing themselves inside their tiny kitchen, it became a nuisance when the customers, rather presumptively, insisted that the chefs not issue forth with expletives as the orders piled up during lunch hour.

That is when Duck’s decided it was finally time to expand into the storefront across the sidewalk. With the clientele safely out of earshot, they could focus on doing what they do best: making really good food.

Much has been written about the donuts at Ducks, but it bears repeating. The mouth-watering, cinnamon sugar donuts have a perfect crunch and a humbling crumble. It can’t be overstated – don’t miss out on the donuts – they’re dynamite.

Ducks is open for lunch, when they serve a range of sandwiches on freakishly tasty homemade breads, but they also host special events in the evenings. They have recently announced a recurrent wine dinner, which promises to be fantastic. But the local dinner is perhaps their most interesting festivity. Inspired by Barbara Kingsolver’s book, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, Duck’s has instituted a four-course meal, based on local, seasonal ingredients, one night out of every month.

They do a vegetarian and an omnivore’s menu, so make sure to specify your preference when you make your reservation. They also invite a speaker (usually a local farmer or artisan) to talk about the issues surrounding local food and answer any questions. At $20 per person and half-priced wines, this is an excellent value. To find out more about local dinners and the new wine dinners at Duck’s visit their website and sign up for their eNewsletter.

Duck’s Cosmic Kitchen

111-D New St.
Decatur, Georgia 30030
404-371-8823
duckscosmickitchen.com

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress